See Our Full DirectorySearch Lawsuits
FDA Requirements for Classification
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) describes a medical device as any item that is used in the treatment, diagnosis or prevention of a medical condition. This can include a range of items used in the field of health care no matter their complexity. For instance, a bedpan is considered a medical device, as is any equipment used to determine lab test results. Any item classified as such must undergo regulation by the FDA before it can be used in a medical capacity.
Devices must also be recognized in The United States Pharmacopeia and The National Formulary. This documentation regulates a number of health care items, including medical devices, drugs, compounded pharmaceutical products (drug preparations created to meet an individual patient need), supplements and fillers used to complement the main ingredient of a medication.
What Makes a Medical Device Defective?
Like all products, medical devices are required to be manufactured and sold in a condition that is neither defective nor unreasonably dangerous. With certain exceptions, the fact that these products have been tested or approved by regulatory agencies does not exempt them from these legal requirements.
If a device maker sells a product that is found to be defective or unreasonably dangerous, it can be held liable to a patient injured by the product. If the medical device has a known risk that comes with its use, those risks must be disclosed to patients and healthcare providers so that an informed decision can made when considering whether to use the device to treat a particular medical condition.
Example of a Claimed Defective Medical Device
While a medical device can be an effective treatment method, a report indicates significant discrepancies in identifying potential safety issues. According to Bloomberg, defective endoscopes led to numerous patients falling ill via super bugs, or bacteria that has proven resistant to treatment with antibiotics.
While Olympus (the device manufacturer) and the FDA were seemingly aware of these issues, both failed to act in a manner that prevented potentially dangerous devices from being used. A senate report on this issue pointed to a number of failures which led to increased rates of sickness stemming from these devices.
In this particular case, Olympus failed to alert U.S. hospitals and doctors to the difficulty in cleaning endoscopes (thereby trapping bacteria, which would then be spread to patients) though they did caution patients in Europe about possible risks. The report also found fault with the way the FDA monitors instances of device safety issues. Unlike the monitoring of pharmaceutical products, device monitoring relies on what is referred to as a “passive” system. Accordingly, it can be difficult for the FDA to notice patterns in health issues related to defective devices, which causes a delayed reaction.
Why a Washington Defective Medical Device Attorney May Be Necessary
Patients injured by Olympus endoscopes have cited manufacturer negligence in lawsuits stemming from their illness. One patient fell ill after undergoing a procedure using the manufacturer’s endoscope. She was among seven other patients also suffering from the same effects, two of whom died as a result of their illnesses. Patients claim that inherent design flaws render the endoscopes unsafe due to the difficulty of proper sterilization after use.
How a Washington Defective Medical Device Attorney Can Help
Device makers have a duty to provide safe products. If there are risks of harm associated with their products, they also must provide adequate warnings. If a device maker fails to fulfill this duty, it could be held liable in lawsuits for injuries that may result.
People injured by defective medical devices may be eligible to recover money for:
- Medical Expenses
- Lost Wages
- Pain and Suffering
The families of those who have died may be eligible to recover money for funeral expenses and the pain that comes with losing a loved one.
Top Defective Medical Devices
Washington Bair Hugger Lawsuit
Some patients claim that the Bair Hugger warming blanket has led to serious complications such as severe surgical site infection and additional surgeries.Learn More
Washington IVC Filter Lawsuit
Though the purpose of Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters is to prevent dangerous blood clots from making their way to the heart and lungs, some patients undergoing these treatments have experienced serious side effects and complications.Learn More
Washington Metal Hip Replacement Lawsuit
Some patients fitted with metal hip replacements have allegedly experienced device failure and other complications, including a type of blood poisoning called “metallosis.”Learn More